Design Review Process
How PAA design reviews work and how to get the most value from them.
Design reviews are a core PAA activity. They provide structured evaluation of proposed technical changes before implementation begins.
When to request a review
Request a design review when you’re planning:
- New services or significant components
- Changes to data models or storage systems
- Integration with external systems or vendors
- Security-sensitive functionality
- Performance-critical paths
- Anything that makes you slightly nervous
When in doubt, request a review. Brief reviews of simple changes take minimal time and occasionally catch important issues.
Submitting for review
To initiate a design review, provide:
- Problem statement — What are you trying to solve?
- Proposed approach — How do you plan to solve it?
- Alternatives considered — What else did you evaluate?
- Open questions — Where do you want specific guidance?
Format doesn’t matter—a doc, a diagram, a Slack message. We’ll ask clarifying questions if needed.
Review process
Reviews follow this structure:
- Intake — We acknowledge receipt and schedule review (within 24 hours)
- Analysis — We evaluate the proposal against our assessment criteria
- Discussion — Synchronous conversation to explore concerns and alternatives
- Documentation — Written report with findings and recommendations
Most reviews complete within 3-5 business days. Urgent reviews can be expedited.
Assessment criteria
We evaluate designs against:
| Criterion | Key Questions |
|---|---|
| Correctness | Does it solve the stated problem? Are edge cases handled? |
| Security | What’s the attack surface? How is access controlled? |
| Scalability | What happens at 10x load? Where are the bottlenecks? |
| Reliability | How does it fail? How do you know it’s failing? |
| Maintainability | Can the team understand and modify this in 6 months? |
| Operability | How do you deploy, monitor, and debug this? |
Not every criterion applies to every review. We focus on what matters for your specific change.
After the review
Review findings fall into three categories:
- Blockers — Must be addressed before proceeding
- Recommendations — Should be addressed, but can proceed with awareness
- Observations — Worth noting, no action required
You decide how to proceed. Our role is to illuminate risks and trade-offs, not to gatekeep.